I thought I'd pass on a piece of a discussion passed on to me from an email discussion list:
A: "England has the phenomenon of young women getting themselves murdered, by whoever it is who rapes and murders young women. It's as bad as Long Island. Every time you pick up a British paper, you see a story about a young woman getting killed or the body of a young woman being found, and you know that in most instances the girl let herself get into a dangerous situation she shouldn't have, because the instinct of fear and self-protection has been trained out of them by modern society.
"Here's a story (sorry if I've told it before), not about a young woman, but indicative of the general liberal attitude. A woman, a distant relative, was out for a walk in a park. A strange man began walking along beside her and talking to her. She didn't try to get away from him but continued walking with him at her side. Then she continued following the path where it entered into a concealed bushy area, with the man continuing with her. He pulled out a knife and slashed her throat. Thankfully, she survived.
"When I first heard this story about ten years ago, I said, 'She behaved like a typical liberal. She doesn't believe in the existence of evil or enemies. She didn't want to discriminate or be mean by getting away from the man. The normal instinct of self-preservation was not active in her.' Again, thankfully she wasn't killed, but she easily could have been.
"Of course, there's the specifically racial aspect of this -- young white women getting involved with, or otherwise making themselves accessible to, black men, and getting raped or killed as a result. This is a significant phenomenon that hasn't been written about in any mainstream publication.
"In the mid '90s I received for a while a white racist newspaper, I forget the name of it. The editorial content was primitive and fairly vile, but the one worthwhile thing about it was that it reprinted from mainstream newspapers around the country news stories about black men killing white women. It was just remarkable. It is almost as if there is this 'gene' in a certain type of white woman that keeps bringing white women into relationships with black men who then kill them. And the phenomenon keeps going on and on, with nothing in the society warning white women against it."
B: "You brought up a tragically widespread phenomenon. I think the cause of this aside from the liberal post-white brainwashing is that some (a small minority, thank G-d) white girls consider black guys to be more masculine than young white men. It's the same with Oriental girls and white guys, you always see a lot of white-Oriental couples where the guy is white, but almost never the other way around."
It seems to me the exchange raises some points worth thinking about. The 16+ years of education middle-class people go through these days does seem designed to root out responses most people would otherwise have as a matter of course. It includes a huge amount of propaganda. The idea, apparently, is to create a new type of human being for a new and vastly improved society. Can that possibly work? Dealing with the world around us in a realistic and effective way involves an enormous complex of attitudes, reactions, implicit beliefs and whatnot. How much can that be tinkered with and still remain functional? Does thought control really mean better thinking?
Then, of course, there are the particulars -- Oriental girls and white guys, the naive middle class-white chick from the 'burbs and the black dude with 'tude, etc. We aren't supposed to notice any of this or think anything of it, or if we do notice something like young women getting abused and murdered the answer isn't bringing back what unreconstructed types always considered common sense but rather massive reconstruction of human nature so no-one has to accept or even think about anything so gross and un-PC. Does that make sense?